Bluesky · Hashtag

#IAD2026

22
posts · 30d
7
users
1
posts / day
3.1
posts / user
-22% vs last week

#IAD2026 is an active hashtag on Bluesky. In the last 30 days, 7 people shared 22 posts with it — around 1 a day. Activity is down 22% versus the previous week, peaking on Oct 17 with 3 posts.

#IAD2026 posts per day (last 30 days)

Related tags

Tags most often used together with #IAD2026.

Posts with #IAD2026

Yenn dc ☂️
@yenndc.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy
5 days ago
‣ Intersex Youth and Sports [2/2] Intersex Awareness Weeks 2026. campaigns.oiieurope.org/i… [This one I'm finding kinda… facepalmworthy. I mean, it *is* a serious issue, and it can indeed discourage intersex youth […] [Original post on kolektiva.social]
[logo: Intersex Awareness Weeks 2026.]

	«Intersex Youth and Sports»

		[logo: OII Europe.]
‣ Intersex Youth and Sport.

What are the obstacles affecting participation of intersex youth in sport?
For example, the policy introduced in 2026 by the IOC entitled “Protection of the Female (Women's) Category in Olympic Sport” endorses mandatory genetic screening for women athletes. The IOC praises its new policy to be based on the latest scientific evidence, however the policy lacks methodological transparency, meaning: this eligibility tool is flawed.



In higher levels of sport, regulations have historically coerced young women with naturally high testosterone levels into unwanted surgeries (removal of reproductive organs) or forced hormonal suppression just to retain eligibility. These are not medical treatments but rather a punishment for bodies that don't fit the binary. That is not fairness, it's a violation of basic human rights.



New regulations such as the July 2025 World Athletics Eligibility Criteria and the new 2026 IOC guidelines, blatantly ignore the impact that these rules will have, specifically on intersex youth.
For example, the policy introduced in 2026 by the IOC entitled “Protection of the Female (Women's) Category in Olympic Sport” endorses mandatory genetic screening for women athletes. The IOC praises its new policy to be based on the latest scientific evidence, however the policy lacks methodological transparency, meaning: this eligibility tool is flawed.



In higher levels of sport, regulations have historically coerced young women with naturally high testosterone levels into unwanted surgeries (removal of reproductive organs) or forced hormonal suppression just to retain eligibility. These are not medical treatments but rather a punishment for bodies that don't fit the binary. That is not fairness, it's a violation of basic human rights.



New regulations such as the July 2025 World Athletics Eligibility Criteria and the new 2026 IOC guidelines, blatantly ignore the impact that these rules will have, specifically on intersex youth.
1 0 0

Posts are pulled live from Bluesky and cached briefly. Posts with content labels are hidden.