#gpt is an active hashtag on Bluesky. In the last 30 days, 58 people shared 395 posts with it — around 13 a day. Activity is down 51% versus the previous week, peaking on Sep 4 with 30 posts.
Tags most often used together with #gpt.
gigazine.net
AIのせいでスピリチュアルな体験や宗教的妄想に取りつかれる「ChatGPT誘発性精神病」患者が続出している
生成AIは最先端のIT技術のひとつですが、信者と対話して罪を赦す「AIキリスト」が誕生したり、AIを教祖とする新興宗教が台頭したりと、宗教との親和性も指摘されています。対話型AIの中でも特に人気のChatGPTにより、多くのユーザーがスピリチュアルな妄想や陰謀論にはまっていると、ポップカルチャー情報誌のRolling Stoneが報じました。
www.reddit.com
Reddit - Dive into anything
.NET Community, if you are using C#, VB.NET, F#, or anything running with .NET... you are at the right place!
hackernoon.com
GPT-6 Astra vs. Meshy 7 for 3D Creation: What Three Creator Workflows Reveal
hackernoon.com
GPT-6 Astra vs. Meshy 7 for 3D Creation: What Three Creator Workflows Reveal
GPT-6 Astra can automate Blender and build interactive 3D scenes, but creators are turning to Meshy when character geometry needs to hold up.
Thankful Thinker @thankfulthinker.bsky.social
Which AI? According to "use.ai," which lists 7 fascist traits: "...if we count generously: 6 or 7 out of the 7 traits have appeared in some form. If we count more strictly - requiring the full fascist-regime version of each trait, not just warning signs - the answer is closer to 4 or 5 out of 7"
tugatech.com.pt
GPT-6 Astra decifra mensagem militar alemã com 108 anos
O modelo de linguagem da OpenAI, o GPT-6 Astra, conseguiu resolver um mistério com mais de um século ao descodificar uma mensagem de rádio alemã enviada nos últimos dias da Primeira Guerra Mundial, em 1918. Segundo os detalhes publicados pelo programador prinz, a inteligência artificial processou co
thewrongtimes.com
GPT-6 Stabs Baby Doll in 17 of 20 Tests, Giving Silicon Valley Three Results to Focus On
Silicon Valley has identified three encouraging results in a robot safety test, thanks to a reporting method that involves stopping before you get to the other seventeen. In Robocurve's RoboHa…
www.buchodi.com
ChatGPT now knows what you do on other websites via ad collector
www.buchodi.com
ChatGPT now knows what you do on other websites via ad collector
lemire.me
AI is breaking the academic sorting machine
20 September 2026 · 4 min I see the mathematicians panicking at what we can do with agentic AI. Let us be clear on what we are talking about. In a few weeks, someone who is not a high-level mathematician can, with AI, produce the equivalent of a good PhD thesis in math. I could see a top 1% high school student, given enough of an AI token budget, just write the equivalent of a PhD thesis as a hobby. If Joe Smith completed a PhD thesis in math back in 2022, it is now possible for a really smart high schooler to generate the same output while playing video games. Joe must not be too happy about it, especially if Joe is still looking for a prestigious faculty position. Notice how we are not so excited. I mean, why aren’t we celebrating this incredible breakthrough? Finally, all the math problems we have can be solved faster! It is worth reflecting on why we don’t care. Part of the issue is that most of academic research lost its customers years ago. In part thanks to the arrival of “peer review” in the 1970s, we have long ago closed the research world into siloed communities. The purpose of the academic output is to sort people out for jobs. Write papers that are impressive and you may get a good professorship. If you don’t, then you will be flipping burgers. There is an incredible glut of people with academic credentials, but only so many jobs at the top. The glut has been continuously, and somewhat deliberately, increasing. If you hold a PhD today, your chance of having a tenure-track or tenured position is about 10% and falling. Let me be clear. Any academic who shows worry for what the PhDs might do now should look in a mirror because you have been training too many for decades. And, also, if fewer people decide to go for the PhD that might be more than fine. AI disrupts the sorting mechanism in mathematics… But do you think for a minute that it does not apply to mechanical engineering, sociology, etc.? Is that bad news? No. I think that it is excellent news and I have been saying so for years. Here is what I wrote in 2024… « AI’s ability to generate vast amounts of text raises concerns about a potential flood of irrelevant theoretical papers, further straining the evaluation system. Stonebraker’s (2018) call for rewarding problem-solving over publication needs revisiting. Perhaps the emphasis should be on the impact and significance of research, not just its passage through peer review—a skill replicable by AI. AI can pave the way for a “golden age” of scientific progress if we can develop new evaluation methods focused on problem-solving and real-world impact. The scientific community must adapt to the evolving landscape. By recognizing the limitations of peer review and prioritizing the pursuit of meaningful solutions, we can ensure that AI becomes a catalyst for scientific advancement, not a detriment. » I predict that, over time, the focus will move away from “papers as the final output.” Nobody wants a paper about cancer, we want to eradicate cancer. We should reward people who get results, no matter which tools they use. And solving a problem because it is impressive to do so is not enough. « But Daniel, Mathematicians can’t cure cancer or give us antigravity. » Maybe it is time they try. Frankly, the AI disruption might be precisely what we needed. « But Daniel, won’t AI just replace all of us? » I wish. But thus far, it is not happening. I have more AI accounts than most people have pencils and I am working 50 hours a week. Intelligence is not a scalar quantity. Once an AI can do something, I somehow always find more work to do. **Further reading**. Daniel Lemire, Will AI Flood Us with Irrelevant Papers? Communications of the ACM, Vol. 67, No. 9 (September 2024). Daniel Lemire, "AI is breaking the academic sorting machine," in _Daniel Lemire's blog_ , September 20, 2026, https://lemire.me/blog/2026/09/20/ai-is-breaking-the-academic-sorting-machine/. [BibTeX]
securityaffairs.com
AI Helps Hackers Hijack OpenAI Staff Accounts Through a Forum
AI helped researchers exploit a Discourse flaw in under 72 hours, hijacking OpenAI staff accounts and exposing the risks of shared SSO. Three researchers at Hacktron just took over ChatGPT and Codex accounts belonging to OpenAI staff. The attack did not rely on phishing techniques or a leaked password. Through an image upload on OpenAI’s […]
Posts are pulled live from Bluesky and cached briefly. Posts with content labels are hidden.
