#abortion

www.contrariannews.org

A Bad-News Week for Reproductive Freedom

But there is hope.

en.killbait.com

Legal Expert Questions FDA Nominee's Ties to 'Crazy Land' Think Tank Before Senate Hearing

A legal expert and journalist, Katie Phang, criticized President Donald Trump's nominee for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Dr. Heidi Overton, ahead of her Senate confirmation hearing. Speaking on her YouTube channel 'Katie Phang News,' Phang highlighted Overton's role as chief policy officer and vice chair of the America First Policy Institute's Center for a Healthy America, which Phang referred to as 'Crazy Land.' Phang argued that Trump's nominees lack independent thought and merely parrot the president's views. She also criticized Overton's co-authored policy brief that labeled abortion as 'corrosive to children, women, and society broadly,' calling it 'all medical lies, all scientific lies.' Phang warned that Overton would wield significant power over personal health decisions, including reproductive rights, and urged viewers not to assume her gender meant she would support women's health. Additionally, Phang and a board-certified OB-GYN, Dr. Jennifer Lincoln, criticized Republican senators for potentially using the FDA's safety review of mifepristone to restrict abortion access, accusing them of wanting to 'weaponize' the review to change laws and limit reproductive freedom. Dr. Lincoln specifically asked Overton if she would be transparent about the review's findings, questioning whether she would 'bury' results showing mifepristone's safety. Phang emphasized the need for the public to be 'armed with the truth' to counter misinformation from Overton during her confirmation process.

apobangpo.space

Bich Nguyen (@[email protected])

"At least six major hospitals have agreed to refuse gender-affirming hormones and surgery for transgender young people and agreed to make payments to the federal government, according to deals with the Department of Justice." https://apnews.com/article/transgender-genderaffirming-hospitals-trump-justice-agreement-34faeeab4575b81160ae6531254584cb #healthcare #lgbtq #transgender #ChildrensHealth #USpol

www.motherjones.com

Newsom Vetoes Bill That Would Ban Extraditions for Abortion and Gender-Affirming Care

When Louisiana authorities tried to extradite a California doctor last winter for sending abortion pills to women in their state, Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back—hard. “We will not allow extremist politicians from other states to reach into California and try to punish doctors based on allegations that they provided reproductive health care services,” Newsom declared. “Not today. Not ever.” Yet nine months after that ringing defense of abortion providers and reproductive freedom, Newsom has blocked Democratic efforts to enshrine the same anti-extradition policy into state law. The soon-to-be-ex-governor has vetoed a bill that would have prohibited future governors from handing over abortion providers, helpers, and patients to red states for criminal prosecution. The bill also barred extraditions involving transgender care. Newsom’s decision was “incredibly disappointing” and “certainly not what we were expecting,” says Pavitra Abraham, director of state campaigns for Reproductive Freedom for All. The veto of AB 2164—also known as the Care Without Fear Act—has alarmed reproductive rights advocates around the country because of California’s critical role in preserving abortion access since the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The state is home to telemedicine providers, mail-order pharmacies, research organizations, and other groups that have helped keep...

en.killbait.com

Supreme Court Lets Stand Lower Court Ruling in Surrogacy Custody Case Involving Abortion Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene in a high-profile custody dispute that has drawn national attention and raised complex legal questions at the intersection of surrogacy agreements and reproductive rights. Justice Elena Kagan, who handles emergency petitions from California, rejected the surrogate's request to block a lower court ruling that awarded custody to the biological parents, a couple from Texas. The case began when the Alaska-based surrogate, after learning the fetus had a severe congenital heart defect called hypoplastic left heart syndrome at around 20 weeks of gestation, chose not to terminate the pregnancy despite the biological parents' wishes. The condition requires multiple open-heart surgeries beginning shortly after birth. The surrogate subsequently traveled to Texas, where abortion restrictions are among the nation's strictest, and gave birth to the child. The biological parents then filed suit to enforce their surrogacy agreement and gain custody. Lower courts ruled in favor of the parents, prompting the surrogate to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court. Justice Kagan's decision was made independently without consulting the full court, and she provided no public explanation, which is standard practice for such emergency rulings. The case highlights the legal uncertainties that can arise when surrogacy agreements cross state lines and when disputes emerge over medical decisions during pregnancy. It also underscores the tensions between contractual obligations in surrogacy arrangements and a surrogate's bodily autonomy and reproductive choices. Legal experts say the ruling does not set a broad precedent but leaves unresolved questions about how similar conflicts should be handled in the future.