Bluesky · Hashtag

#PeerReviewWeek

305
posts · 30d
137
users
10
posts / day
2.2
posts / user
+ 1225% vs last week

#PeerReviewWeek is an active hashtag on Bluesky. In the last 30 days, 137 people shared 305 posts with it — around 10 a day. Activity is up 1225% versus the previous week, peaking on Sep 14 with 64 posts.

#PeerReviewWeek posts per day (last 30 days)

Posts with #PeerReviewWeek

Science Magazine
@science.org
7 days ago
Increasing the breadth of researchers trained as reviewers is crucial. In 2024, we began a program that invites reviewers to add trainees as co-reviewers. Nearly 6000 scientists have participated. All our reviewers, past and present, can now get credit on ORCID. #PeerReviewWeek
Science thanks each of our reviewers for their critical contribution. #PeerReviewWeek
0 7 39
UPColorado
@upcolorado.bsky.social
4 days ago
When you try to get a "tiebreaker" third peer reviewer. Happy #PeerReviewWeek to everyone (even Weird Barbie)!
Three barbies, each representing Peer Reviewer 1 (regular barbie), peer reviewer 2 (supreme court justice barbie) and Peer Reviewer 3 (weird barbie)
0 8 17
Penn Press
@pennpress.bsky.social
5 days ago
Happy #PeerReviewWeek! Let's celebrate the valuable work of peer review, an often unrecognized task that ensures that the work we publish is accurate, reliable, and merits becoming part of the durable scholarly record. Thank you, peer reviewers!
0 4 19
Cambridge University Press
@universitypress.cambridge.org
5 days ago
Help shape the research of tomorrow as a peer reviewer. 💡 Understand more about the editorial process 📄 Keep up to date with new research in your field 🤝 Share your expertise to support fellow researchers Find out more 🔗 cup.org/3SRcnmn #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2026
Video thumbnail
Play button
0 7 10
Science Magazine
@science.org
about 1 year ago
Increasing the breadth of researchers trained as peer reviewers is crucial to upholding quality in academic publishing. Last year, the Science journals began a pilot in which invited peer reviewers could add trainees as co-reviewers, with more than 2200 scientists participating. #PeerReviewWeek
White text on a red background: Science thanks each of our reviewers for their critical contribution. #PeerReviewWeek
0 13 49
preLights
@prelights.bsky.social
5 days ago
Reading recommendation for #PeerReviewWeek @ethanewe.bsky.social highlights a study that looks at 115,000+ PLOS papers to explore who chooses open peer review and whether openness relates to article quality. #preprint Adrian Barnett & Matt Spick #preLight⬇️ prelights.biologists.com/….
Who chooses open peer review and is it an indicator of article quality? An observational study of PLOS journals - preLights

prelights.biologists.com

Who chooses open peer review and is it an indicator of article quality? An observational study of PLOS journals - preLights

Opening up peer review

0 6 10
Boydell & Brewer
@boydellandbrewer.bsky.social
4 days ago
Celebrated each year #PeerReviewWeek shines a light on the crucial process of peer review and the vital work peer reviewers do within scholarly publishing. In this blog we get insights into the process with author & reviewer, Chris Walton. buff.ly/R4XthC0 #ScholarlyPublishing #PRW2026 #BookSky
Peer Review Week: Q&A with Chris Walton

buff.ly

Peer Review Week: Q&A with Chris Walton

For Peer Review Week we get insights into the vital peer review process with author and reviewer Chris Walton.

0 3 7
Biology Open
@biologyopen.bsky.social
8 days ago
For this year's #PeerReviewWeek, we want to thank all the reviewers that have participated in BiO's Fast & Fair - an initiative that aims to provide authors with faster peer review decisions without compromising quality.
Biology Open's practice of compensating reviewers is rare and, in my view, contributes to a more respectful and high-quality review culture.
1 6 15

Posts are pulled live from Bluesky and cached briefly. Posts with content labels are hidden.