Bluesky · Hashtag

#EconSky

2,096
posts · 30d
222
users
70
posts / day
9.4
posts / user
-10% vs last week

#EconSky is an active hashtag on Bluesky. In the last 30 days, 222 people shared 2,096 posts with it — around 70 a day. Activity is down 10% versus the previous week, peaking on Sep 1 with 111 posts.

#EconSky posts per day (last 30 days)

Posts with #EconSky

Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
What some people aren’t factoring into their analysis is the reality that companies were buying tons of inventory to beat the tariffs. That’s cash taken from being able to invest or hire. In fact the probably cut costs and jobs as a result. #econsky
1094 4997 27225
Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
I don’t understand why no one in congress has proposed amending The Federal Reserve act to include the following addition among the mandates “Reducing the federal debt-to-GDP ratio to sustainable levels.” Keep inflation and employment the same , just add to the equation #econsky
583 822 5654
Sean Brodrick
@seanbrodrick.bsky.social
3 months ago
The MSM is terminally stupid. The big news today is that retail sales are "robust", jumping 0.9% month-over-month in May, above forecasts of 0.5%. A search by category shows the biggest bulk of higher spending came at gas stations. This is not good, unless your name is Chevron. #EconSky
263 1458 4445
Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
1 more #econsky. What about #tariff-buyouts to foreign countries. Let them buy down their tariff rate with a one time payment = to their tariff receipts from USA goods ? That goes right to deficit and debt reduction. Just spit balling along for feedback. Good or bad
1595 378 3772
The Democratic Difference
@demdifference.bsky.social
about 1 year ago
BREAKING: JD Vance just gave a big speech in which he claimed that "for the first time in a very long time, workers' wages are rising faster than inflation.." The only problem? The Trump Labor Dept. reported exactly the opposite just yesterday, showing real wages falling in June. #EconSky
176 841 2658
Prof. Caroline Fohlin
@caroline-fohlin.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
The total estimated savings when using Cost Plus Drugs compared to Medicare was $462,375,491.53 and $618,833,850.34 for 30- and 90-count pricing, respectively. The price of a 42.5-gram tube of vaginal estrogen cream was $22.48 on Cost Plus Drugs, compared to $293.66 through Medicare Part D. #econsky

We are ready to help pave a path for lower medication and healthcare costs for taxpayers journals.lww.com/fpmrs/fullte...

journals.lww.com

46 281 2066

Posts are pulled live from Bluesky and cached briefly. Posts with content labels are hidden.