Bluesky · Hashtag

#EconSky

2,055
posts · 30d
204
users
69
posts / day
10.1
posts / user
-4% vs last week

#EconSky is an active hashtag on Bluesky. In the last 30 days, 204 people shared 2,055 posts with it — around 69 a day. Activity is down 4% versus the previous week, peaking on Jul 13 with 112 posts.

#EconSky posts per day (last 30 days)

Posts with #EconSky

Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
What some people aren’t factoring into their analysis is the reality that companies were buying tons of inventory to beat the tariffs. That’s cash taken from being able to invest or hire. In fact the probably cut costs and jobs as a result. #econsky
1095 5000 27245
Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
about 1 year ago
I don’t understand why no one in congress has proposed amending The Federal Reserve act to include the following addition among the mandates “Reducing the federal debt-to-GDP ratio to sustainable levels.” Keep inflation and employment the same , just add to the equation #econsky
586 822 5657
Sean Brodrick
@seanbrodrick.bsky.social
about 2 months ago
The MSM is terminally stupid. The big news today is that retail sales are "robust", jumping 0.9% month-over-month in May, above forecasts of 0.5%. A search by category shows the biggest bulk of higher spending came at gas stations. This is not good, unless your name is Chevron. #EconSky
263 1462 4450
Mark Cuban
@mcuban.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
1 more #econsky. What about #tariff-buyouts to foreign countries. Let them buy down their tariff rate with a one time payment = to their tariff receipts from USA goods ? That goes right to deficit and debt reduction. Just spit balling along for feedback. Good or bad
1600 378 3773
The Democratic Difference
@demdifference.bsky.social
about 1 year ago
BREAKING: JD Vance just gave a big speech in which he claimed that "for the first time in a very long time, workers' wages are rising faster than inflation.." The only problem? The Trump Labor Dept. reported exactly the opposite just yesterday, showing real wages falling in June. #EconSky
176 841 2661
Prof. Caroline Fohlin
@caroline-fohlin.bsky.social
over 1 year ago
The total estimated savings when using Cost Plus Drugs compared to Medicare was $462,375,491.53 and $618,833,850.34 for 30- and 90-count pricing, respectively. The price of a 42.5-gram tube of vaginal estrogen cream was $22.48 on Cost Plus Drugs, compared to $293.66 through Medicare Part D. #econsky

We are ready to help pave a path for lower medication and healthcare costs for taxpayers journals.lww.com/fpmrs/fullte...

journals.lww.com

46 281 2065

Posts are pulled live from Bluesky and cached briefly. Posts with content labels are hidden.