Most popular posts by Online Political Thinkers community members over the last 24 hours. Updated hourly.
Judge Goodwin: "An anonymous government is no government at all. It cannot be held accountable. A masked agent freely uses force without justifying his actions, and the public cannot name him to challenge his conduct. A regime of secret policing has no place in our society."
At this point, we should just assume they’re lying. But by their own account the kid had no record. US citizen. At the very least, it looks like multiple policy violations — they surrounded the car, fired into a moving vehicle, killed him through the driver’s side window.
Any Democrat not promising long prison sentences for Trump officials is one who will accommodate Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg, crypto bros, the gambling companies and every other billionaire. And they'll legitimize it under the Democratic brand, with the power of incumbency. This is my litmus test.
Pack the court with so many people that you won't even know their names. That it won't even be news when one of them dies. That they have to meet in an NFL stadium. That their relatives won't realize they're related to a Supreme Court justice. That they quit because they don't feel important.
Positive take (relatively) on “we have lived among such people this whole time”: Yes, and that shows things don’t need to be like this. There will always be the sort of people who’d try to get the state to hurt kindergartners. We just need to keep them out of institutional power, and on the fringe.
I have yet to see any evidence that this is true. There are some retention bonuses and some performance-based bonuses, but as far as I can tell the idea of a per-head bounty is an urban legend, apparently circulating even among contract detention staff. I’m open to being wrong. Hope I’m not.
Of course Trump is confused. The Supreme Court told everyone that the Constitution doesn’t apply to him and he can break laws without consequence if he feels like it. They effectively rewrote the Constitution just for him. More than once! Why would he expect the law to suddenly matter for tariffs?
This week @jamellebouie.net had some questions for me about where the US is at now and why the term "concentration camp" might be a useful way to think about the crisis. (He interviewed me eight years ago for Slate on a similar topic. Let's hope we don't end up having the same discussion in 2034.)
Innovators became rent seekers and are very aggrieved that they’re no longer treated like innovators. Sorry the public doesn’t see the world’s biggest companies and richest people pushing enshittified, mediocre, or damaging products as plucky start-ups doing exciting things. But whose fault is that?
This administration whined to the SCOTUS that they should not have to pay out SNAP even though they were legally obligated to do so. They spent so much cash appealing a court case they knew they were gonna lose just for spite and to waste taxpayer money just to make life worse for poor Americans
"Why would the president pursue military action against the country without nuclear weapons instead of the one with nuclear weapons" is a question that answers itself when stated plainly, and also explains why any regime wary of foreign intervention would rationally pursue a nuclear arsenal.
Hyper-presidentialism is not only something Supreme Court conservatives have inflicted on us, it has been the central project of Scalia school "originalism" since the 1980s. Congress *has* tried to claw back power w/ reforms, and SCOTUS has repeatedly struck those laws down or made them ineffectual.
There is a type of anti-liberal "leftist" pundit who is utterly incapable of producing any assessment of the world beyond “liberal hypocrisy is the real evil.” They are allowing their singular, disdain-driven focus on (neo-) liberalism to completely distort their perspective on reality.
I read this and thought "Oh, this is something a first-year Econ grad student would think of, thinking they're being clever but ignoring 300 different aspects of actual behavior." The guy behind it? Lt. Col. .. sigh ... Justicz (SUCH lazy writers) ... who spent 3 yrs as an Econ grad student at MIT.
San Diego County Supervisor Paloma Aguirre was denied access to ICE's Otay Mesa concentration camp today. The county is legally allowed to conduct health inspections but she was turned away by CoreCivic, the private prison contractor that operates the facility. www.instagram.com/reel/DU_uYq2...
The problem with this framework is it assumes that the two are in tension. In reality, democracy is the only hope we have of achieving societies that provide material and physical security. Without the accountability of elections, leaders will rob the public blind.
Miami-Dade man who voted for Trump says ICE "kidnapped" his partner of 20 years, who is Cuban. 8 months detained, she hasn't seen a judge and could be deported to Cuba. "I didn't vote for this," he says. "I'm sorry. I didn't know this was going to happen." www.local10.com/news/local/2...
Originalism: Okay, fine, the law doesn’t allow what I want. But what if the people who wrote the law messed up, and wanted the law to allow what I want, except — oops! — they accidentally wrote it differently? That should outweigh what the law says (except when I agree with what the law says).
On tariffs, the Supreme Court ruled that factual reality is real (rather than a version of "who are courts to say the Trump admin's obvious lies aren't true?") and the law is what the statue says (rather than whatever Trump and his backers wish it said). That's a positive. They often don't do that.
We told you of this recently, but we've been asked to comment. Again it's striking because Francis backed Leo in large part due to his diplomacy. Francis sometimes had the loose lips of the bouncer he used to be; in Leo he saw an ally who was more careful. Leo does choose his words. In the few -
I think Kavanaugh being in the minority on tariffs is a good sign for him on birthright citizenship, because writing a novella-length dissent on tariffs is exactly the kind of punk-ass move he’d pull if he was going to go against Trump on birthright citizenship
It's good that they got at the right result, but the tariffs issue isn't really just a matter of statutory interpretation, nor major questions doctrine. This is a power Congress fundamentally cannot delegate to the president, no more than they could say the president will decide income tax rates.
Good morning to readers; Kyiv remains in Ukrainian hands. As a boy, Oleh loved to sit with his dad in the conductor's room as he drove the train. Now, he repairs trains hit by Russian drones -- attacks which are increasingly common as Russia tries to destroy logistics routes.
So far from this #EpsteinRegime - the Commerce Sec entangled in Epstein files - the Labor Sec under investigation for alleged inappropriate sexual relationship w/ a subordinate; her husband implicated in sexual assault - the DHS Sec & alleged lover implicated in a reported mile high fuck jet & ↘️
I think the psychosis around data centers in both directions is sort of dumb. They're light/heavy industry land uses with with some positive externalities and some negative ones. It seems like the kind of thing where it's actually basically fine to let the company and the community negotiate?