Recent posts by Online Political Thinkers community members. Updated hourly.
The Supreme Court has to understand that the president is breaking the law in ways I like. Or at least in ways that I'm unwilling to challenge even though they're objectively not achieving their supposedly national interest goals and also breaking the law. So the Court must defer to that.
Let's take a peek in at the people who spent the last 50 years calling for patriots to water the tree of liberty with blood, who hung Obama in effigy, who cheered the murders of Michael Brown and George Floyd, who stormed the Capitol to steal an election... Oh look at these fucking snowflakes
Marjorie Taylor Greene just denied on CNN that she's on a "revenge tour" because Trump wouldn't let her run for senate, as AOC has claimed. Greene said it's not true and she doesn't want to run for senate because it's gridlocked and they "get nothing done." Unlike... the House, Marj?
my issue with this is that the conservative post-liberal position continues to elude questions of power and political economy: these points are all correct in terms of how most women end up having to deal with the challenges of corporate life, but embedding catholic views on child-rearing doesn't...
yeah this irritates me too. "there is NO AUDIENCE for this", I say as I repost and share the link. it's you. you're the audience. clicks and being talked about are the measure of professional success for these people, and you're sharing their stuff and talking about it.
Oh. Wow. Look, I know ppl say dumb stuff in college, and we have to give ppl room to grow. But: 1. There's "dumb stuff" and there's <but what's 3000 executions? Stop whining>, w the latter far harder to write off as youthful indiscretion. 2. I'm not sure Douthat HAS shown signs of changing much.
There's an interesting throughline here about MAGA identification serving as a proxy for being politically aware enough to know what position your side is "supposed" to have and to adapt your position based on it. (I don't think this is unique to MAGA) www.kff.org/public-opini...
yeah unlike the other postliberals i still make it a point to read Leah, even if i disagree with her point tremendously. i think it helps that her strand of postliberal gender stuff is written in a way that makes me want to jump out the window, even if i disagree with it 100%
she elaborates on points like this in other work (like her CLJ interview) where she makes the fair point that contemporary institutions are hostile to women *as* women in terms of their institutional design, and so she wants to argue that both the (classical liberal right) and the...
The far right, which has disproportionate influence today, thinks a lot of problems stem from the fact that women have the right to vote, and that the world would be better if women knew their place. . No, seriously. As @aselrod.bsky.social details here, they go on and on about it. A lot.
what sort of fascinates me here is that this is completely compatible with care liberalism: it's not like contemporary liberal theorists post-Rawls have neglected to answer the question of "how does dependency shape life, and how does this reshape our conception of the liberal self?"
the conventional wisdom was that Mickie Sherrill was running a bad campaign...which turned out to be either wrong or irrelevant. which means either analysts are bad at assessing campaigns, or campaigns don't matter much...or possibly both. www.everythingishorrible.net/p/mickie-she...
Trump officials keep acting like conditions worsening and Americans suffering on their watch reflects badly on the opposition, and the public will get mad at people without power, because those are the people who care about Americans and want things to run well. I don’t think that’s how it works.
Good morning readers; Kyiv remains in Ukrainian hands. Ukraine has once again been plunged into darkness by Russia's attacks on energy infrastructure. For Ukrainian mothers, like Myroslava, this means dealing with the stress and mess of caring for an infant – with no power.
it's deeply fascinating when you basically know the intellectual history of both the people Douthat is interviewing one is a former atheist-turned-Catholic postliberal "feminist" that wrote a book on Dreher's work the other is Helen Andrews, mostly known for basically the Todd Seavey monologue
Nancy Pelosi voted against the Defense of Marriage Act the President of her own party pushed. She spoke out for human rights activists in China after the Tiananmen Square Massacre. She voted against the Iraq War. Thanks to her, people with pre-existing conditions can have health care.
Good piece. The... I'm not sure if "more serious" is right, but the version of it Vance and others more openly advocate... is this crackpot idea of giving extra votes to parents, which I wrote about @theunpopulist.net. Nominally that wouldn't discriminate by sex, but it's unabashedly patriarchal.
Running against a bad, unpopular president doing bad, unpopular things works. Thinking a bad, unpopular president is not worth talking about—one narrow election is forever, he’s magic, no one cares—is ridiculous. Shouldn’t need saying, but here we are, so it’s good @gregsargent.bsky.social does.