1. Bluesky Feeds /
  2. Joy 💙🦸 /
  3. Artificial Intelligence🧑‍💻

Feeds Stats

  • 💙 Liked by 1 user
  • 📅 Updated 7 months ago
  • ⚙️ Provider skyfeed.me

Artificial Intelligence🧑‍💻 Likes over time

Like count prediction
The feed Artificial Intelligence🧑‍💻 has not gained any likes in the last month.

Feed Preview for Artificial Intelligence🧑‍💻

Kenney
@kenney.nl
about 23 hours ago
Pretty disappointed in both @humblebundle.com and especially in @girlswhocode.bsky.social. Please teach girls how to code, don't push them into generative AI. That won't build their skills. Prioritize foundational programming skills and awaken their interest. "Tired of long days writing code"???
51
355
1003
Cliff Pervocracy
@pervocracy.bsky.social
about 16 hours ago
no joke, this is a realer issue than you even know if you touched grass in the late 2010s. Generative AI is just where NFT dudes went next, but AGI is a religious project to bring about the Singularity so our souls will be emulated forever in Computer Heaven.

I think we need a full accounting of which of the tech executives think Roko’s Basilisk is real I really think we deserve full transparency on which of them genuinely think they’re building a computer god who will punish them if it’s not built.

9
195
759
Kaitlin Ruiz
@kaitlinruiz.bsky.social
about 8 hours ago
your regularly scheduled reminder that my page is one without any tolerance for generative AI, and that tech dependent on theft and environmental harm is not a source of empowerment for anyone
2
49
320
Joshua Foust 🪖🎮
@joshuafoust.com
about 18 hours ago
“In a Bloomberg interview, Vincke admitted that Larian has been pushing generative AI internally, even though it hasn't led to gains in efficiency or speed.” The “need” to rush into AI adoption is executive peer pressure. It is the ideology of business leadership triumphing over data and people.

Larian Studios will hold fan Q&A about dev processes following AI backlash, saying it will "make changes" to processes that "fail to align with who we are." bit.ly/48IIJFe

3
59
196
Stephanie Burgis
@stephanieburgis.bsky.social
about 11 hours ago
I agree with this entire thread. I am deeply disappointed by @sfwa.org 's decision, especially considering how many of its members (including me) had our work stolen for the creation of that generative AI. There is NO way anyone should be eligible for a Nebula without doing ALL the writing themself.

I'm so disappointed in @sfwa.org for this. I understand that by requiring disclosure of partial LLM-created works, as their announcement states, means SFWA's letting "nominators and the voters" make the final decision. BUT YOU'RE STILL ALLOWING SUCH WORKS ON THE NEBULA AWARDS FINAL BALLOT! 1/

3
30
93
⚡️🌙
@dystopiabreaker.xyz
about 24 hours ago
the transformer model is not going to spontaneously uninvent itself. much consternation from this fact
2
4
83
Retro Computers
@retrocomps.bsky.social
about 13 hours ago
Invented by Hiroshi Horiuchi at the height of the 80's home robotics trend, Robie gave kids who wanted a little robot a much simpler treat - if you put a coin in his hand and pressed down, he'd wake up, look at his treat, gobble it down, and chomp with gusto before licking his robotic lips.
A yellow cylinder, with legs, two arms, green eyes, and a red tongue. The free hand is posable is just strong enough to hold a pen; the big palm hand lifts in order to put the coin into his mouth.
4
9
73
May “Bunny” Peterson 🦄 (Mostly Updates)
@goddessblade.bsky.social
about 10 hours ago
Something we should understand about generative AI is how deeply capitalist it is. It's fundamentally about squeezing more value for capital out of existing work to try and automate intellectual and creative labor, the kinds of labor that can't truly be automated.
1
11
68
⚡️🌙
@dystopiabreaker.xyz
about 24 hours ago
it would be incredibly easy to create a new account and rack up a huge following and clout by proclaiming why “generative ai” or the “ai bubble” is about to collapse and everything will go back to normal, with vague techy sounding language with just enough insight + credentialism sprinkled in
4
1
40
Artifacter
@artifacterneo.bsky.social
about 21 hours ago
In a way, the existence of generative AI has allowed me to come to terms with my own less-than-smooth, inconsistent lines. I no longer need to try to erase any “hand-drawn feel” from my illustrations.
0
1
27
Ars Technica
@arstechnica.com
about 11 hours ago
Google is generally happy to see people using generative AI tools to create content—and it’s doubly happy when they publish it on its platforms—but there are limits to everything.
YouTube bans two popular channels that created fake AI movie trailers

arstechnica.com

YouTube bans two popular channels that created fake AI movie trailers

Google loves AI content, except when it doesn’t.

1
6
25
Ketan Joshi
@ketanjoshi.co
about 21 hours ago
The Converesation, like most univerisities, has been a total disaster on generative AI and its impact on knowledge and information, but this is one of the worse ones I've seen in a while archive.ph/aPYN2
AI increased the variety of academic sources
The study also looked at the differences in article downloads originating from Google and Microsoft search platforms.

Microsoft’s Bing search engine introduced an AI-powered Bing Chat feature in February 2023. This allowed the researchers to compare what kind of articles were recommended by AI-enhanced search versus regular search engine.

Interestingly, Bing users were exposed to a greater variety of sources than Google users, and also to more recent publications. This is likely caused by a technique used by Bing Chat called retrieval-augmented generation, which combines search results with AI prompting.

In any case, fears that AI search would be “stuck” recommending old, widely used sources was not justified.

Moving forward
AI has had significant impact on scientific writing and academic publishing. It has become an integral part of academic writing for many scientists, especially for non-native speakers and it is here to stay.

As AI is becoming embedded in many applications such as word processors, email apps, and spreadsheets, it will be soon impossible not to use AI whether we like it or not.

Most importantly for science, AI is challenging the use of complex high-quality language as the indicator of scholarly merit. Quick screening and evaluation of articles based on language quality is increasingly unreliable and better methods are urgently needed.

As complex language is increasingly used to cover up weak scholarly contributions, critical and in-depth evaluations of study methodologies and contributions during peer review are essential.

One approach is to “fight fire with fire” and use AI review tools, such as the one recently published by Andrew Ng at Stanford. Given the ever-growing number of manuscript submissions and already high workload of academic journal editors, such approaches might be the only viable option.
5
6
25
Chris Paxton
@cpaxton.bsky.social
about 17 hours ago
Predicting how the environment changes over time is a key task in robotics, enabling all kinds of downstream tasks. Trace Anything is a very interesting look at how you can train models which predict the trajectory each point will take in the future robopapers.substack.com/p….
Video thumbnail
Play button
0
0
18
Cuckoo 🔞
@cloudcuckoocountry.bsky.social
about 21 hours ago
Youtube's AI-generated video summaries seem like the kind of thing where the people at the board meeting were like "How can we incorporate generative AI into our product? We need something! Anything! Give me anything!" and that was the best idea they came up with
1
0
18
The Conversation U.S.
@us.theconversation.com
about 6 hours ago
As #AI increasingly brings people the news, it does more than simply pass along information. Large language models subtly highlight certain viewpoints while minimizing others, often without users realizing it. buff.ly/bEvfU8c
People are getting their news from AI – and it’s altering their views

theconversation.com

People are getting their news from AI – and it’s altering their views

Even when information is factually accurate, how it’s presented can introduce subtle biases. As large language models increasingly bring people the news, this bias is a looming problem.

5
17
17
wolf ΘΔ
@timberwolf.bsky.social
about 16 hours ago
tbh I'm gonna say it if you can't code without help from generative AI, then you can't code
5
0
17
Eurogamer
@eurogamer.bsky.social
about 20 hours ago
"A lot of things have become lost in translation," Larian boss Swen Vincke says following generative AI backlash - promises a Divinity AMA in the new year "to give you more insight" www.eurogamer.net/lost-in….
Divinity trailer screenshot showing close up of man in golden mask holding a flaming torch
4
2
17
Peter Counter, Nightmare Host
@peterbcounter.com
about 10 hours ago
How does this keep happening? Why are literary orgs and events and granting bodies so out of touch with how generative AI is perceived by the creatives who make up their communities? If you don't like humanity leave the humanities.

Another Nebula Awards nomination cycle is in full swing, and the addition of poetry and comics, along with the presence of LLMs in industry, required careful consideration. Read on, and vote well! We trust our voters & look forward to what they choose to celebrate. www.sfwa.org/2025/12/19/p...

2
3
16
lider de torcida do j fonsy
@didionneta.bsky.social
about 12 hours ago
gente não defendendo o diabo mas ia tem TANTA COISA que não é chatgpt, um monte de machine learning util é vendida como ia neah

A universidade na qual eu me formei anunciou a abertura de um bacharelado desses para o ano que vem, fiquei tão decepcionada g1.globo.com/df/distrito-...

g1.globo.com

1
7
16
jenna newman phd
@jennanewman.bsky.social
about 3 hours ago
“Generative AI chatbots are a probabilistic technology that can make mistakes, hallucinate false information & tell users what they want to hear. But when they present as humanlike, users ‘attribute higher credibility’ to the info they provide, research has found.”🧪

About to go on my first true work-free vacation of 2025 (I hope)! This is one of my final stories for the year, about the extremely humanlike chatbots we've been given and whether they should be that way. Happy holidays, here's a gift article: www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/t...

www.nytimes.com

1
3
15
Patrick Samphire 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
@patricksamphire.bsky.social
about 11 hours ago
Also, are there actually any writers out there who might be eligible for a Nebula who would want to admit they are using generative AI? To say they are plagiarists unable to write on their own? Where is this constituency pushing SFWA for this fudge?

I'm so disappointed in @sfwa.org for this. I understand that by requiring disclosure of partial LLM-created works, as their announcement states, means SFWA's letting "nominators and the voters" make the final decision. BUT YOU'RE STILL ALLOWING SUCH WORKS ON THE NEBULA AWARDS FINAL BALLOT! 1/

0
1
15