LOL SCOTUS www.supremecourt.gov
I built this feed based primarily on the lists curated by @suffolklitlab.org. It pulls out posts that seem to be talking about the US Supreme Court. Also, it's limited to about 100 posts at a time.
Feed on BlueskyFeeds Stats
- đ Liked by 7 users
- đ Updated 4 months ago
- âď¸ Provider skyfeed.me
SCOTUS Talk Likes over time
Like count prediction
The feed SCOTUS Talk has not gained any likes in the last month.
Feed Preview for SCOTUS Talk
NEW: On behalf of the Democratic Party, today we filed our brief in the U.S. Supreme Court to defend a campaign finance law that has been on the books for more than 50 years from Republican attacks. www.supremecourt.gov/DockâŚ.
52
687
2589
Sir that is no way to talk to the Supreme Court
302
929
6471
Trump's petition asking the Supreme Court to let him officially redefine (read: rescind) birthright citizenship is now available and
I wish I did not have to worry about the Supreme Court taking seriously such obviously, egregiously unserious & racist bullshit
www.supremecourt.gov/DockâŚ.
31
291
947
I continue to think the Trump admin will lose on this issue. They are just so brazenly wrong on this that it's a bridge too far for the Supreme Court. Despite everything, my current prediction is at minimum a 7-2 loss for the Trump admin.
15
17
209
one of the defining memes of our time is the president of the united states pretending he is hearing about the death of a supreme court justice on an airport tarmac from a reporter
5
4
153
SCOTUS blessed Kavanaugh Stops, by pretending they were pleasant exchanges with your friendly ICE agent.
Will the conservatives now allow ICE to lock up people for days without probable cause?
h/t @akalhan.bsky.social for coining the phrase
www.lawandchaospod.com/p/âŚ.
www.lawandchaospod.com
SCOTUS Blessed "Kavanaugh Stops." Will They Also Give Thumbs Up To "Roberts Residencies?"
Maybe Barrett Bookings? Alito Arrests? Gorsuch Guest Passes?
2
35
123
As @evanbernick.bsky.social wrote back in January, "When the Supreme Court eventually weighs in on the order, we will not learn whether it is constitutional. We will learn whether the Supreme Court is prepared to follow the Constitution."
lpeproject.org
The Anti-Constitutional Attack on Birthright Citizenship
Trump's executive order is not merely unconstitutional. It is an effort to perpetrate the very evils that abolitionists and Republicans sought to eradicate from our constitutional order.
Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie@audrelawdamercy.bsky.social
Trump's petition asking the Supreme Court to let him officially redefine (read: rescind) birthright citizenship is now available and I wish I did not have to worry about the Supreme Court taking seriously such obviously, egregiously unserious & racist bullshit www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
www.supremecourt.gov
1
55
162
Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof
@evanbernick.bsky.social
about 6 hours agocrazy, how could he get an idea like that www.supremecourt.gov/opinâŚ.
15
94
317
A reminder to law students and anyone else who needs it: failure to cite to, attempt to distinguish, and/or call for the overruling of on point negative precedent is sanctionable. In normal times these lawyers should lose their admission to SCOTUS, and risk losing their licenses for such conduct.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
Incredible. They once again wrote a brief that simply pretends that Lynch v. Clarke, the first major case on birthright citizenship, just simply does not exist. It gets not a single mention or acknowledgment.
0
8
15
Iâm seeing a level of student cynicism about the rule of law beyond anything Iâve experienced in many years of teaching. Not just in SCOTUS but in judges across the board. I understand why and Iâm curious what this bodes for the future.
0
1
17
âIs it that the Chief Justice doesnât accept that the Court is losing credibility on a daily basis; that he thinks the Court doesnât need that credibility in order to fulfill its intended role in our constitutional system; or that he doesnât care?â
Me on John Roberts as his Court turns 20 today:
www.stevevladeck.com
180. The Roberts Court Turns 20
The Supreme Court is much less popular and much more divisive today than it was when John Roberts was sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice on September 29, 2005. And at least much of that is his fault.
333
1046
3092
Ruin a movie by adding a Supreme Court Justice, Fields Medal winner, Lady Byng Trophy awardee, or actor/actress who has appeared as a guest star on THE LOVE BOAT:
RAIDERS OF THE JOAN VAN ARK.
Tash@nlarimer.bsky.social
Ruin a movie by adding a Supreme Court Justice, fields Medal winner, Lady Byng Trophy awarded, or actor/actress who has appeared as a guest star on THE LOVE BOAT: MEET ME MARTIN ST. LOUIS
0
1
3
"Well, everyone knows the Supreme Court handed down Lynch v. Clarke. What this brief presupposes is...maybe it didn't."
- DOJ
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
Incredible. They once again wrote a brief that simply pretends that Lynch v. Clarke, the first major case on birthright citizenship, just simply does not exist. It gets not a single mention or acknowledgment.
0
3
6
Itâs the Un-Happy Birthday of the Roberts Court today. đ
Weâre going Live with @stevevladeck.bsky.social at 2 pm ET today for a catch-up session on SCOTUSâ latest failings.
See you then!
substack.com/@katiephang?...
14
79
442
I regret to inform you that the new Supreme Court term is opening with a bang next week
Tuesday's oral argument in Chiles v. Salazar will feature right-wing activists claiming the First Amendment gives state-licensed therapists a right to traumatize queer kids
ballsandstrikes.org/scotuâŚ.
ballsandstrikes.org
Right-Wing Activists Are Pushing For a Constitutional Right to Harm LGBTQ Kids
The Alliance Defending Freedom wants the Republican justices to hold that the First Amendment protects homophobesâ legal right to ignore state laws that protect kids.
3
84
154
Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof
@evanbernick.bsky.social
about 6 hours agoMy only hesitation about âKavanaugh Stopâ is that âTerry Stopâ was coined after an actual case decided by a full Court, which is supposed to be what is required for a precedent. One Justice saying stuff in a shadow docket case? Nah.
6
3
56
It's called "following the law." A tough concept for Carrie's folks these days, but here we are.
As I wrote on Friday: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-âŚ.
5
50
243
1. He's talking about America's largest city.
2. "The money" is supposed to come from the U.S. Congress, not "me."
3. Trump's error on #2 is the fault of the cowardly Republicans in Congress and on the Supreme Court.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com
Trump on Mamdani: "He is going to have problems with Washington like no Mayor in the history of our once great City. Remember, he needs the money from me, as President, in order to fulfill all of his FAKE Communist promises. He wonât be getting any of it, so whatâs the point of voting for him?"
37
121
472
I wish liberals talked this way more. Because let's face it, most of the Supreme Court's precedents are not our friend. Without giving it much thought, we all could list several dozen that need to be overruled.
www.theguardian.com
Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket
The court is expected to weigh in on same-sex marriage next session, which it legalized in 2015
4
3
27
None of this is a surprise.
This is what I wrote at Law Dork about the Supreme Court order and Kavanaugh's opinion in the racial profiling case back on Sept. 8: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-âŚ.
5
69
206
An abortive attempt at a Kavanaugh Stop.
WuTangIsForTheChildren@wutangforchildren.bsky.social
ICE Nazis in Chicago tried to kidnap a food delivery worker but my man was too fast for those slow bastards
46
183
1169
NEWS: The Trump administration is, as was reported Friday, asking the Supreme Court to take up birthright citizenship. Notably, DOJ is asking SCOTUS to grant cert in the Washington multistate case and grant cert before judgment in the Barbara class-action case.
More to come at Law Dork:
www.lawdork.com
Law Dork | Chris Geidner | Substack
The Supreme Court, law, politics, and more. Click to read Law Dork, by Chris Geidner, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.
6
117
259
Kavanaugh: this is fine.
Jazmine Ulloa@jazmineulloa.bsky.social
As immigration agents have escalated their tactics, US citizens, many of them Latino men, have been stopped and in some cases taken into custody by law enforcement officers. Allison, Jenny and I took a closer look at the encounters. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/u...
www.nytimes.com
11
72
406