Harlo 
constellation.microcosm.blue
Feeds Stats
- 💙 Liked by 6 users
- 📅 Updated 12 months ago
- ⚙️ Provider skyfeed.me
SkyThreads Likes over time
Like count prediction
The feed SkyThreads has not gained any likes in the last month.
Feed Preview for SkyThreads
Nothing makes this more clear than how they said something about it did not actually having been used multiple times in the email. They repeat over and over that this exploit has not been successfully used yet 😂
0
0
1
Yeah it's hard to be super scared of it when the circumstances to trigger it would also be considered a security breach to begin with. Honestly, it sounds like a plot point in a movie more than anything. "Get in, plug this usb in, and when he plays videogame next, we will get everything"
1
0
3
Like, seriously, you can just do that and keep making it better, and it's more important than any one platform doing anything
![fig (aka: [phil])](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/avatar/plain/did:plc:hdhoaan3xa3jiuq4fg4mefid/bafkreiamovv77cuv63icyhvminjanb2dz4u6o5bjjzyk72ob44qtbrd224@jpeg)
fig (aka: [phil])@bad-example.com
ok we are live! constellation can now count by many-to-many link records!! motivating example was bluemoji, but it's already usable for some general traversal. you can ask, > what issues on @tangled.org have a "good-first-issue" label? check it:
0
1
2
Me, too. Along with the overall “bending the knee”. I’m not paying for that.
0
0
2
I’ve watched the Young and the Restless (sorry 🥴) just about since it’s inception. I still watch it via my DISH because I don’t think it matters, but I canceled my Paramount+ as soon as they settled with 47. I also stopped the DVR for 60 Minutes, and will not watch local news on CBS.
0
0
4
I'm not the guy that's going to say "go build your own software", but there's definitely a middle-ground here somewhere lol
0
0
2
Thank you, Dave.
FWIW, I’ve canceled my Paramount+ subscription. Everyone who cares about truth and reporting should also do so, because otherwise we’re helping to pay for disinformation.
Dave Weigel@daveweigel.bsky.social
What I'm referring to. It's a privilege to be invited onto networks to talk about my reporting but I have limits. Similarly stopped doing NewsNation after Nextar took its Kimmel stance.
0
0
0
You are staring at a photo trying to decide if it's AI or not when you could just be doing things
1
0
9
I looked it up, and Paramount+ lost 1.3 million subscribers in the first or second quarter, but they attribute that to bundles they had sold overseas
They won’t report the third quarter until November, when I’m hoping to see even more unsubscribers. I am one of them.
0
0
0
Needed this reminder again. Going to drink another tall glass of water. Maybe I can flush out the doom.
Karen K. Ho@karenho.bsky.social
When things feel pointless, remember the small things that make a difference in your life, then do them for yourself and others. A high protein meal. A big glass of water. Taking meds. A compliment or word of thanks. A long walk outside. I see how hard you're trying. Little things still matter.
0
0
2
The little people pleasing voice in my head always feels guilty and like I’m failing somehow when the massage therapist comments on how stiff I am.
0
0
1
𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 of this‼️
0
2
2
Good!
Murshed Zaheed@murshedz.bsky.social
Also becoming increasingly clear how much the pressure on Dems in these last 9 months to fight harder has had an impact. The House Dems are showing remarkable grit. And they will get stronger as the public blame Republicans more and more for breaking/shutting down the US govt. (2/2)
www.axios.com
0
0
1
![Our lower court colleagues have already chosen the obvi-ous—i.e., least disruptive and most humane-answer to that question.? So, this stay application presents us with an antecedent decision: whether the Government's interest in terminating TPS right now is so urgent that this Court, rather than the able judges currently exercising jurisdiction over the matter, should be the one to decide those individuals' interim fate. See Noem v. Doe, 605 U.S. .
(2025) (JACKSON, J., dissenting from grant of application for stay) (slip op., at 7-8); see also Magnum Import Co. v.
Coty, 262 U. S. 159, 164 (1923) (explaining that "this Court requires an extraordinary showing" before it will override the stay decision of a lower court, rendered "with a much fuller knowledge [of the case] than we can have"). Only if the Government demonstrates such a time-sensitive need should we even consider vetoing the lower courts' unanimous judgment about the most equitable interim status.
The Government has made no such showing. Yet, for the second time in this same case, the Court grants it the](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreielodg7leawuocyugdofvzga3hterlqeg3gyz5gdqg3ykvohz6nf4@jpeg)
![SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 25A326
KRISTI NOEM, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TPS ALLIANCE, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION FOR A STAY
[October 3, 2025]
In March of this year, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered a preliminary order postponing the effective date of the Secretary of Homeland Security's decision to remove "temporary protected status" (TPS) from Venezuelan nationals living in the United States. See 8 U.S. C. §1254a; 5 U.S. C. §705.
In May, this Court stayed that order while the Government appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ultimately affirmed the District Court's preliminary order. Last month, the District Court entered final judgment in respondents' favor, holding unlawful and setting aside the Secretary's actions effectuating her decision— namely, her vacatur of a pending extension of TPS for Venezuelan nationals, and her termination of that status itself.
See 5 U. S. C. §706(2). (The District Court also concluded that the Secretary unlawfully vacated a TPS extension for Haitian nationals. The Government now seeks to stay the portions of the District Court's judgment pertaining to Ven-ezuela, but not Haiti. See Application 7, n. 6.)
The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. Although the posture of the case has changed, the parties' legal arguments and relative harms generally have not. The same result that we reached in May is appropriate here.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreifwdli7xxfny6ivyfuusq7lptvsyntu7ypokqdyrgpoxlyw4dmokq@jpeg)
