Recent posts by Legal Academics community members. Updated hourly.
1st Cir. will not lift a district court decision that blocked the Trump administration from defunding federal assistance to housing and services for homeless people. Administration missed a crucial step: didn't ask the dist. ct. to reconsider or appeal it. www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/fi...
Hands down, whoever is writing these for Kimmel is doing an EXCELLENT job. Its not about the humor. Its the clear, accurate, accessible way he is explaining IN DEPTH what the admin is doing. Id argue no other host on late night does this quite at this level. Impressive. youtu.be/JjKPF9tG7_U?...
Framing the #Section230 discussion as a choice between keeping the provision intact or scrapping it misses a key point: Repeal wouldn’t fix many of the concerns it raises. Today in @thehill.com, policy director @nadinefj.bsky.social proposes a new legislative approach. thehill.com/opinion/tech...
A Democratic Electrician Nabs a State Senate Seat in Republican Florida With Brian Nathan’s victory certified, Democrats won two of three state legislative races in this month’s special elections, all in Republican-leaning districts. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/u...
Miriam notes in her update here how theatrical Sauer was being with his gestures while Trump was in the room. Listening from afar today, I had the distinct impression that Sauer was more emotional and animated than I have ever heard him. www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04...
If—and right now it’s a big if—things do eventually work out, watch how quickly people forget how close we got to complete democratic collapse. They’ll say we overreacted. They’ll forget those who suffered and died. They’ll move on. But the victory will be worth it anyway. Keep fighting.
Friends, Native people are, indeed, Native to this land. But they were not Native to the United States. We all need to, somehow, collectively unpack the presumption that the U.S. is (and has ever been) the only instantiation of "this land." There were, and are, many other governments here.
Lindsey Graham is America’s biggest enabler of Trump’s wars & of Trump’s inflation. And while young Americans are dying in his war of choice & you’re struggling to make ends meet, Lindsey Graham is having the time of his life with a bubble wand in his hand at Disney World.
So delighted to hear that our edited volume, Speaking Science to Power, has been shortlisted for the 2026 Book of the Year prize by the Conflict Research Society. All credit goes to our amazing coeditors, @oliverkaplan.bsky.social & Rachel Epstein ➡️ conflictresearchsociety.org/the-conflict...
"Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also resisted taking a strong position, keeping his attention on Cuba." Maybe the dual-hatted Secretary of State/National Security Advisor could do his job rather than fixating on his pet project. www.theatlantic.com/national-sec...
1. SCOTUS is going to have a hard time ruling for Trump on birthright. He did himself no favors today. 2. Our birthright citizenship rule is a universal one, designed to prevent Trump from doing what he's trying to do now -- deciding who's American and who isn't. 3. SCOTUS? Still a major problem.🧵
Never mind that I died inside when I heard Gorsuch say in Trump v Barbara arguments that there weren't any immigration laws in the 1860s. Taps new book 👇 in which I document the over a century of first colonial then state-level international and domestic migration laws before federalization.
Good, efficient summary by @pemalevy.bsky.social @isabelaalhadeff.bsky.social: "the legal minds who submitted friend of the court briefs supporting Trump’s EO ... put forward both novel and recycled already-rejected arguments that are not only morally reprehensible but historically implausible."
Friends, again with respect because this is a complex issue: children born to citizens of tribal governments do not have constitutional birthright citizenship under many, if not most forms of constitutional argument and authority (incl. Supreme Court precedent relied upon in this case)./1
Journos: There was a ton of convoluted discussion of federal Indian law in Trump v Barbara. Please interview actual scholars of the subject like Professors Dolan @maggieblackhawk.bsky.social @tannerallread.bsky.social now or when that final opinion arrives probably in June.
Good, efficient summary by @pemalevy.bsky.social: "[T]he legal minds who submitted friend of the court briefs supporting Trump’s executive order . . . have put forward both novel and recycled already-rejected arguments that are not only morally reprehensible but historically implausible."
👇🎯 Again, everyone's views about inflation and the economy are heavily driven by partisanship and media consumption patterns, & we should stop playing Calvinball & constantly inventing new reasons why folks think everything is terrible over & over again. bsky.app/profile/mcop...
If you liked my recent podcast on Amicus w/ Dahlia Lithwick, here's a video with historians about Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship also on Spotify + Apple podcasts. Birthright citizenship is a very narrow part of US immigration, in this I went much broader as my book does.
I wonder how the four schools in each of the Final Fours are doing financially? I know we’re doing great here at USC due to a supportive state legislature, in-migration, & a booming economy, & that UConn is unfortunately not doing well due to underinvestment by the state of CT.
Trump v Barbara. 1) There's a dispute over what original public meaning of the birthright clause was. ACLU has more evidence. 2) Alito had bizarre textual questions that do not bear on holding of Wong Kim Ark. 3) Legal + policy arguments in play. Hope policy ones win. 4) This was all unnecessary.
Posted my Ron Wayne interview on LowEndMac, and when I pointed out the non-Apple focus, some commenter accused me of burying the lede. I hate this. He clearly wanted to talk about many other things besides this. Apple made up such a small part of his life. He deserves to have his full story told.
As someone who lived through the Carter years, I feel like younger Democrats have a misconception of his presidency. The economy was awful, horrific during his presidency. People don't have to say otherwise just bc he was a Dem, & shouldn't. To poll worse than Carter on the economy is really bad.