Most popular posts by Global News and Politics Professionals community members over the last 24 hours. Updated hourly.
"On the doorstep people don’t make a distinction between graduate visas & small boats" This is: a) objectively wrong (plenty of polling evidence) b) suggests utter contempt for electorate's thought processes c) is a dreadful way to make policy Otherwise fine www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Bluesky is an education as a European, in that here you have someone suggesting that it is unreasonable that the Democratic 'tent' exclude a man who has never actually disavowed his belief that it would be better that products of 'miscegenation' such as myself had not been born.
Will British Labour politicians learn anything from the Canadian election, and entertain the possibility that there are votes in defying toxic American aggression, and making the case for liberalism? Or will they just keep on inanely chasing the Reform vote? Make your prediction lol.
There are several lessons from Canada for UK politics The biggest, most obvious lesson is likely to be widely ignored in the UK media by Saturday morning! Don't think you could predict & project a 2029 General Election result from the polls 2025/2026. It would be difficult in 2027/2028!
"We can't stop the boats, so let's cancel the Graduate Visa. Voters either don't know the difference or don't care." Terrible way to make policy, self-destructive as economics, and almost certainly doomed politically. Does anyone genuinely think this makes any sense?
It’s 2014. I tell you: “Yeah so you know the guy who funds the Lib Dems? Paul Marshall? Yeah his son’s in Mumford’s band. Anyway Paul’s going to fund a right-wing culture war TV channel called GB News and his son will pop up at Donald Trump’s White House press room asking for asylum for Brits.”
Let's just remember that as recently as *February* the CBC poll tracker was suggesting a 99% probability of the Conservatives winning. This is an extreme upset - thanks in large part to Trump (and a little to Trudeau stepping aside and Carney stepping up). newsinteractives.cbc.ca/elections/po...
Looks like Poilievre's defeat in Carleton will be a microcosm of the Conservative defeat nationally: a small swing away from the Conservatives, an increase in turnout, and the collapse of the NDP (/BQ in Quebec) conspiring to hand the Liberals a narrow victory.
The stocks were sold, the podcasts were squared, the middle-class was quite prepared. He was all set to be the next Canadian Prime Minister - but Pierre Poilievre has now lost his own constituency in Ontario. (There were 91 candidates for the constituency)
As a member of the public, what would make me feel safe is if Labour designed policy on public safety on things that are actually happening. For example, men who want to kill women because they get their ideas from the far-right. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
It took six weeks of negotiations between Sadiq Khan's office, TfL, and the London Fire Brigade... but it sounds like bookswap library shelves are coming back to 15 above-ground tube stations. (Those classed as subsurface tube stations, such as the Oval and Clapham etc are a work in progress.)
I have a lot more time for Clegg than the average person I follow on Bluesky (and, it pains me to admit, in the UK). But I think one problem with *that* article is that part of what pro-European UK politicians miss about EU membership is that EU membership is a way to magnify your country's power.🧵
Important to remember that this policy is not intended to work. It is intended to appease Reform voters. And to the malign the left into appearing as if it supports sexual offences. The reality is further complexity in a broken asylum system, one which will, in fact, make the public less safe.
A Tory/Reform pact already appears to be in action... Labour's Ellie Reeves has accused the Tories of “gifting” Runcorn to Reform by not campaigning in the seat. The chair of Labour told The Huffington Post the Tories were not doing any work on the ground at all (Huffington Post, via LabourList)
The message being communicated to us from govt. is that marginalised people are dangerous (trans people, asylum seekers, migrants, people of colour) and yet the truly dangerous people who literally started riots (the far-right) in the country are getting off scot free. Stupid.
The govt announcement on barring sexual offenders from being granted refugee protection in the UK has several limitations: - the offences have to be committed in UK and fall under Schedule 3 of Sexual Offences Act 2003 - rape and other offences with prison sentences over a year were already a bar
It makes a great headline in the tabloids, but the Home Office has no idea how many people could be affected. Worse, individuals could be unduly excluded from protections - all because the gov is pandering to Reform ahead of this week's local elections. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...